Hi, On 15/02/2021 12:25, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 2:32 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 14/02/2021 18:44, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> SN65DSI83/84/85 devices are MIPI DSI to LVDS based bridge >>> controller IC's from Texas Instruments. >>> >>> SN65DSI83 - Single Channel DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge >>> SN65DSI84 - Single Channel DSI to Dual-link LVDS bridge >>> SN65DSI85 - Dual Channel DSI to Dual-link LVDS bridge >>> >>> Right now the bridge driver is supporting Channel A with single >>> link, so dt-bindings documented according to it. >> >> Shouldn't it describe Dual-link LVDS already for SN65DSI84/85 and Dual Channel DSI for SN65DSI85 even if not implemented in the driver ? > > Patch documented only Single link LVDS as it only supported by driver. > Single link LVDS with Channel A configuration is common across all 3 > variant chips. I have SN65DSI84 with Single link LVDS which is routed > in Channel A. Idea is to go with Single link and add double link later > and document the same. DT Bindings is unrelated to the software support, simply add the second LVDS channel endpoint for SN65DSI84/85 and the second dsi endpoint for SN65DSI85. Neil > > Jagan. > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
