Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: remove atomic helper dirtyfb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Feb 4, 2021, 17:20 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 09:53:40PM +0200, Toni Spets wrote:
> The blocking implementation of the dirtyfb ioctl is extremely slow when
> used for damage tracking on RK3399. If this implementation is in place Xorg
> will default to using it and will slow down considerably when doing a lot
> of small draws. This is most apparent with the fvwm window manager on
> startup where it will almost lock up for many seconds seconds on RK3399.
>
> Removing this implementation did not cause any visible issues on RK3399 but
> it did fix the performance issues on Xorg as it will disable damage
> tracking when the ioctl returns it's not supported.

Then you don't have a manual update panel.

Iirc there were patches to make this faster in recent kernels, on what
kernels did you try this?

Latest was 5.10.12. If there are fixes for this in later kernels I will definitely try it out. 


Also X should only call this in the blocker handler, not all the time.

It does but fvwm is an example that forces it to be called a lot and it's slow enough to cause significant issues. 


So yeah we need to make this faster, not break manual update panels.

Pardon my ignorance but while making this operation faster will indeed make it better wouldn't the correct behavior be to know if a panel requires this or not? 

Making a low performance device wait any extra time for no reason doesn't sound like the correct fix either.

I'm not defending the patch itself as I don't have enough understanding of the drm or kernel so if it's indeed definitely breaking something then of course it can't be used as is. 

Thanks. 


-Daniel

>
> --
> Toni Spets

> From 79984ee67c801f552e9eaf4d0cfb62101d1f0f2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Toni Spets <toni.spets@xxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 21:14:50 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: remove atomic helper dirtyfb
>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
> index 3aa37e177667..2554fd1c8aeb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
>  static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs rockchip_drm_fb_funcs = {
>       .destroy       = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
>       .create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
> -     .dirty         = drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb,
>  };

>  static struct drm_framebuffer *
> --
> 2.27.0
>

> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux