On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:42:54 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Kari, > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:53 AM Kari Argillander > <kari.argillander@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:42:58AM +0800, carlis wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:32:22 +0200 > > > Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > #include "fbtft.h" > > > > > > > > > > #define DRVNAME "fb_st7789v" > > > > > @@ -66,6 +69,32 @@ enum st7789v_command { > > > > > #define MADCTL_MX BIT(6) /* bitmask for column address order > > > > > */ #define MADCTL_MY BIT(7) /* bitmask for page address order > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > > > +#define SPI_PANEL_TE_TIMEOUT 400 /* msecs */ > > > > > +static struct mutex te_mutex;/* mutex for set te gpio irq > > > > > status */ > > > > > > > > Space after ; > > > hi, i have fix it in the patch v11 > > > > > > > > Yeah sorry. I accidentally review wrong patch. But mostly stuff are > > still relevant. > > > > > > > @@ -82,6 +111,33 @@ enum st7789v_command { > > > > > */ > > > > > static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par) > > > > > { > > > > > + int rc; > > > > > + struct device *dev = par->info->device; > > > > > + > > > > > + par->gpio.te = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "te", 0, > > > > > GPIOD_IN); > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(par->gpio.te)) { > > > > > + rc = PTR_ERR(par->gpio.te); > > > > > + dev_err(par->info->device, "Failed to request te > > > > > gpio: %d\n", rc); > > > > > + return rc; > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > You request with optinal and you still want to error out? We > > > > could just continue and not care about that error. User will be > > > > happier if device still works somehow. > > devm_gpiod_get_index_optional() returns NULL, not an error, if the > GPIO is not found. So if IS_ERR() is the right check. > > And checks for -EPROBE_DEFER can be handled automatically > by using dev_err_probe() instead of dev_err(). > hi, i fix it like below!? par->gpio.te = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "te", 0, GPIOD_IN); if (IS_ERR(par->gpio.te)) { rc = PTR_ERR(par->gpio.te); dev_err_probe(par->info->device, rc, "Failed to request te gpio\n"); return rc; } if (par->gpio.te) { init_completion(&spi_panel_te); rc = devm_request_irq(dev, gpiod_to_irq(par->gpio.te), spi_panel_te_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "TE_GPIO", par); if (rc) { dev_err(par->info->device, "TE request_irq failed.\n"); return rc; } disable_irq_nosync(gpiod_to_irq(par->gpio.te)); } else { dev_info(par->info->device, "%s:%d, TE gpio not specified\n", __func__, __LINE__); } > > > You mean i just delete this dev_err print ?! > > > like this: > > > par->gpio.te = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "te", > > > 0,GPIOD_IN); > > > if (IS_ERR(par->gpio.te)) > > > return PTR_ERR(par->gpio.te); > > > > Not exactly. I'm suggesting something like this. > > > > if (IS_ERR(par->gpio.te) == -EPROBE_DEFER) { > > return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > > > if (IS_ERR(par->gpio.te)) > > par-gpio.te = NULL; > > > > This like beginning of your patch series but the difference is that > > if EPROBE_DEFER then we will try again later. Any other error and > > we will just ignore TE gpio. But this is up to you what you want to > > do. To me this just seems place where this kind of logic can work. > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > regards, zhangxuezhi _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel