On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 03:38:25PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
>
> On Friday 05 October 2012 18:38:58 Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 10:21:37AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > On 10/05/2012 10:16 AM, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 12:47:16PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > >> On 10/04/2012 11:59 AM, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > >>> + for_each_child_of_node(timings_np, entry) {
> > > >>> + struct signal_timing *st;
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> + st = of_get_display_timing(entry);
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> + if (!st)
> > > >>> + continue;
> > > >>
> > > >> I wonder if that shouldn't be an error?
> > > >
> > > > In the sense of a pr_err not a -EINVAL I presume?! It is a little bit
> > > > quiet in case of a faulty spec, that is right.
> > >
> > > I did mean return an error; if we try to parse something and can't,
> > > shouldn't we return an error?
> > >
> > > I suppose it may be possible to limp on and use whatever subset of modes
> > > could be parsed and drop the others, which is what this code does, but
> > > the code after the loop would definitely return an error if zero timings
> > > were parseable.
> >
> > If a display supports multiple modes, I think it is better to have a working
> > mode (even if it is not the preferred one) than have none at all.
> > If there is no mode at all, that should be an error, right.
>
> If we fail completely in case of an error, DT writers will notice their bugs.
> If we ignore errors silently they won't, and we'll end up with buggy DTs (or,
> to be accurate, even more buggy DTs :-)). I'd rather fail completely in the
> first implementation and add workarounds later only if we need to.
>
Okay, that is two against one. And if you say it like this, Stephen and you are
right I guess. Fail completely it is then.
Regards,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
