2012/9/22 Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 09/21/2012 01:22 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >> 2012/9/21 Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> On 09/21/2012 05:22 AM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote: >>>> This patch adds device tree based discovery support for exynos DRM-FIMD >>>> driver which includes driver modification to handle platform data in >>>> both the cases with DT and non-DT, Also adds the documentation for bindings. >>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/exynos/fimd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/exynos/fimd.txt >>> ... >>>> + - samsung,fimd-display: This property should specify the phandle of the >>>> + display device node which holds the video interface timing with the >>>> + below mentioned properties. >>>> + >>>> + - lcd-htiming: Specifies the horizontal timing for the overlay. The >>>> + horizontal timing includes four parameters in the following order. >>>> + >>>> + - horizontal back porch (in number of lcd clocks) >>>> + - horizontal front porch (in number of lcd clocks) >>>> + - hsync pulse width (in number of lcd clocks) >>>> + - Display panels X resolution. >>>> + >>>> + - lcd-vtiming: Specifies the vertical timing for the overlay. The >>>> + vertical timing includes four parameters in the following order. >>>> + >>>> + - vertical back porch (in number of lcd lines) >>>> + - vertical front porch (in number of lcd lines) >>>> + - vsync pulse width (in number of lcd clocks) >>>> + - Display panels Y resolution. >>> >>> Should this not use the new videomode timings that are under discussion at: >>> >>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July/024875.html >>> >> >> ok, I agree with you. then the videomode helper is going to be merged >> to mainline(3.6)? if so, this patch should be reworked based on the >> videomode helper. > > I think the videomode helpers would be merged for 3.7 at the very > earliest; 3.6 is cooked already. Given there are still some comments on > the binding, perhaps it won't happen until 3.8, but it'd be best to ask > on that thread so that people more directly involved with the status can > answer. > as I mentioned before, it's better to use videomode helper instead but for this, we should wait for that the videomode helper are merged to mainline so I think it's better to merge it as is and then modify it for videomode helper to be used later. Thanks, Inki Dae > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
