On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:38:03 +0100 Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As during the plane cleanup, we wish to disable the hardware and > so may modify state on the associated CRTC, that CRTC must continue to > exist until we are finished. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54101 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c > index 6fbfc24..af81f77 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c > @@ -1034,15 +1034,15 @@ void drm_mode_config_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev) > fb->funcs->destroy(fb); > } > > - list_for_each_entry_safe(crtc, ct, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, head) { > - crtc->funcs->destroy(crtc); > - } > - > list_for_each_entry_safe(plane, plt, &dev->mode_config.plane_list, > head) { > plane->funcs->destroy(plane); > } > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(crtc, ct, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, head) { > + crtc->funcs->destroy(crtc); > + } > + > idr_remove_all(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr); > idr_destroy(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr); > } Yeah, looks good. Did we used to not touch the crtc in the plane cleanup? Either way this is safer. Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
