Hi Leela,
See my comments inline.
On Thursday 16 of August 2012 12:08:08 Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
> +enum fimd_version_type {
> + VERSION_8, /* FIMD_VERSION8 */
> +};
> +
> +struct drm_fimd_driver_data {
> + enum fimd_version_type fimd_ver;
> +};
> +
> +struct drm_fimd_driver_data exynos5_drm_fimd_driver_data = {
> + .fimd_ver = VERSION_8,
> +};
I think that the approach with timing_base, as suggested by Joonyoung Shim,
would be much cleaner.
> +static struct platform_device_id exynos_drm_fimd_driver_ids[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "exynos4-fb",
> + }, {
> + .name = "exynos5-drm-fimd",
> + .driver_data = (unsigned long)&exynos5_drm_fimd_driver_data,
> + },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, exynos_drm_fimd_driver_ids);
If I see correctly, this will crash on a null pointer dereference on
Exynos4 without DT, because of NULL driver_data.
P.S. I think you should CC linux-arm-kernel and linux-samsung-soc lists
when submitting patches related to ARM and Samsung SoCs.
Best regards,
--
Tomasz Figa
Samsung Poland R&D Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
