On 12/08/2020 07:42, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> From: Chandan Uddaraju <chandanu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add the needed DP PLL specific files to support
> display port interface on msm targets.
[skipped]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_pll_private.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_pll_private.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..475ba6ed59ab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_pll_private.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2016-2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __DP_PLL_10NM_H
> +#define __DP_PLL_10NM_H
> +
> +#include "dp_pll.h"
> +#include "dp_reg.h"
> +
> +#define DP_VCO_HSCLK_RATE_1620MHZDIV1000 1620000UL
> +#define DP_VCO_HSCLK_RATE_2700MHZDIV1000 2700000UL
> +#define DP_VCO_HSCLK_RATE_5400MHZDIV1000 5400000UL
> +#define DP_VCO_HSCLK_RATE_8100MHZDIV1000 8100000UL
> +
> +#define NUM_DP_CLOCKS_MAX 6
> +
> +#define DP_PHY_PLL_POLL_SLEEP_US 500
> +#define DP_PHY_PLL_POLL_TIMEOUT_US 10000
> +
> +#define DP_VCO_RATE_8100MHZDIV1000 8100000UL
> +#define DP_VCO_RATE_9720MHZDIV1000 9720000UL
> +#define DP_VCO_RATE_10800MHZDIV1000 10800000UL
> +
> +struct dp_pll_vco_clk {
> + struct clk_hw hw;
> + unsigned long rate; /* current vco rate */
> + u64 min_rate; /* min vco rate */
> + u64 max_rate; /* max vco rate */
> + void *priv;
> +};
> +
> +struct dp_pll_db {
This struct should probably go into dp_pll_10nm.c. dp_pll_7nm.c, for
example, will use slightly different structure.
> + struct msm_dp_pll *base;
> +
> + int id;
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> +
> + /* private clocks: */
> + bool fixed_factor_clk[NUM_DP_CLOCKS_MAX];
> + struct clk_hw *hws[NUM_DP_CLOCKS_MAX];
Then these two fields can use exact number of clocks rather than
NUM_DP_CLOCKS_MAX.
> + u32 num_hws;
> +
> + /* lane and orientation settings */
> + u8 lane_cnt;
> + u8 orientation;
> +
> + /* COM PHY settings */
> + u32 hsclk_sel;
> + u32 dec_start_mode0;
> + u32 div_frac_start1_mode0;
> + u32 div_frac_start2_mode0;
> + u32 div_frac_start3_mode0;
> + u32 integloop_gain0_mode0;
> + u32 integloop_gain1_mode0;
> + u32 vco_tune_map;
> + u32 lock_cmp1_mode0;
> + u32 lock_cmp2_mode0;
> + u32 lock_cmp3_mode0;
> + u32 lock_cmp_en;
> +
> + /* PHY vco divider */
> + u32 phy_vco_div;
> + /*
> + * Certain pll's needs to update the same vco rate after resume in
> + * suspend/resume scenario. Cached the vco rate for such plls.
> + */
> + unsigned long vco_cached_rate;
> + u32 cached_cfg0;
> + u32 cached_cfg1;
> + u32 cached_outdiv;
> +
> + uint32_t index;
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct dp_pll_vco_clk *to_dp_vco_hw(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + return container_of(hw, struct dp_pll_vco_clk, hw);
> +}
> +
> +#define to_msm_dp_pll(vco) ((struct msm_dp_pll *)vco->priv)
> +
> +#define to_dp_pll_db(x) ((struct dp_pll_db *)x->priv)
> +
> +int dp_vco_set_rate_10nm(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long parent_rate);
> +unsigned long dp_vco_recalc_rate_10nm(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long parent_rate);
> +long dp_vco_round_rate_10nm(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *parent_rate);
> +int dp_vco_prepare_10nm(struct clk_hw *hw);
> +void dp_vco_unprepare_10nm(struct clk_hw *hw);
> +
> +int msm_dp_pll_10nm_init(struct msm_dp_pll *dp_pll, int id);
> +void msm_dp_pll_10nm_deinit(struct msm_dp_pll *dp_pll);
These functions don't seem to be used outside of dp_pll_10nm. What about
making them static?
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
