On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 06:53:33PM +0530, Shirish S wrote: > From: Shirish Shankarappa <s.shirish@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > The value of MAX_EDID is now valid only for 2 > block EDID data which is 256, but to support > 4 block EDID (E-DDC) this needs to be 512. > > Signed-off-by: Shirish Shankarappa <s.shirish@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_connector.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_connector.c > index d956819..69d02b5 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_connector.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_connector.c > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ > #include "exynos_drm_drv.h" > #include "exynos_drm_encoder.h" > > -#define MAX_EDID 256 > +#define MAX_EDID 512 > #define to_exynos_connector(x) container_of(x, struct exynos_drm_connector,\ > drm_connector) Shouldn't this be in a common drm/edid header to begin with? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@xxxxxxxx Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
