On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:10 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 05:05:03PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > Apparently the patchset has no more comments. > > > > Could you take the patches to your tree? At least 1st and 2nd. > > All now queued up, thanks! I believe it still has not been answered why this can't be pushed into resource providers (clock, regulators, gpio, interrupts, etc), especially for devm APIs where we know exactly what device we are requesting a resource for, so that individual drivers do not need to change anything. We can mark the device as being probed so that probe deferral is only handled when we actually execute probe() (and for the bonus points scream loudly if someone tries to return -EPROBE_DEFER outside of probe path). And now with coccinelle script we can expect a deluge of patches reshuffling drivers... Thanks. -- Dmitry _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
