Hi Dave, What is your opinion about this patch? On 15 August 2012 01:27, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:12:22PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> >> In general what you suggested seems to be the right thing to do. >> However in this particular case, making this "depends on" creates >> recursive dependencies >> and probably that is the reason Dave Airlie decided to make it "select USB" (?) >> > > Probably, yes. Trying to fix this resulted in a race through Kconfig > entries throughout the kernel. Given that your patch is probably ok, > though this should really be fixed properly. > > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- With warm regards, Sachin _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
