On 27/05/2020 11:58, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Add support for other devices than CPUs. The registration function
> does not require a valid cpumask pointer and is ready to handle new
> devices. Some of the internal structures has been reorganized in order to
> keep consistent view (like removing per_cpu pd pointers).
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
> ---
[ ... ]
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_register_perf_domain);
> +
> +/**
> + * em_dev_unregister_perf_domain() - Unregister Energy Model (EM) for a device
> + * @dev : Device for which the EM is registered
> + *
> + * Try to unregister the EM for the specified device (but not a CPU).
> + */
> +void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev) || !dev->em_pd)
> + return;
> +
> + if (_is_cpu_device(dev))
> + return;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&em_pd_mutex);
Is the mutex really needed?
If this function is called that means there is no more user of the
em_pd, no?
> + em_debug_remove_pd(dev);
> +
> + kfree(dev->em_pd->table);
> + kfree(dev->em_pd);
> + dev->em_pd = NULL;
> + mutex_unlock(&em_pd_mutex);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_dev_unregister_perf_domain);
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
