> On 5/21/20 10:42 AM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:05:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On 5/19/20 10:13 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:42:15PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:40:32AM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 09:54:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:48:43AM -0700, ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> >>>>>>> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The kunmap_atomic clean up failed to remove one set of
> >>>>>>> pagefault/preempt enables when vaddr is not in the fixmap.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Fixes: bee2128a09e6 ("arch/kunmap_atomic: consolidate duplicate
> >>>>>>> code")
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> microblazeel works with this patch,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Awesome... Andrew in my rush yesterday I should have put a
> >>>>> reported by on the patch for Guenter as well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry about that Guenter,
> >>>>
> >>>> No worries.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Ira
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> as do the nosmp sparc32 boot tests, but sparc32 boot tests with
> >>>>>> SMP enabled still fail with lots of messages such as:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> BUG: Bad page state in process swapper/0 pfn:006a1
> >>>>>> page:f0933420 refcount:0 mapcount:1 mapping:(ptrval) index:0x1
> >>>>>> flags: 0x0()
> >>>>>> raw: 00000000 00000100 00000122 00000000 00000001 00000000
> >>>>>> 00000000 00000000 page dumped because: nonzero mapcount
> Modules
> >>>>>> linked in:
> >>>>>> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G B 5.7.0-rc6-next-
> 20200518-00002-gb178d2d56f29 #1
> >>>>>> [f00e7ab8 :
> >>>>>> bad_page+0xa8/0x108 ]
> >>>>>> [f00e8b54 :
> >>>>>> free_pcppages_bulk+0x154/0x52c ]
> >>>>>> [f00ea024 :
> >>>>>> free_unref_page+0x54/0x6c ]
> >>>>>> [f00ed864 :
> >>>>>> free_reserved_area+0x58/0xec ]
> >>>>>> [f0527104 :
> >>>>>> kernel_init+0x14/0x110 ]
> >>>>>> [f000b77c :
> >>>>>> ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0x38 ]
> >>>>>> [00000000 :
> >>>>>> 0x0 ]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Code path leading to that message is different but always the
> >>>>>> same from free_unref_page().
> >>>
> >>> Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is
> >>> odd for sparc 32 bit...
> >>>
> >>> Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch?
> >>>
> >>> 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions
> >>>
> >>
> >> That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up
> patches.
> >
> > I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass...
> >
> > 08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh
> > Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f
> >
>
> That doesn't look like it is linux-next, which I guess means that something
> else in linux-next breaks it. What is your qemu version ?
Ah yea that was just 5.7-rc4 with my patch set applied. Yes must be something else or an interaction with my patch set.
Did I see another email with Mike which may fix this?
Ira
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
> > Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> > Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> >
> > Is there another test I need to run?
> >
> > Ira
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Guenter
> >>
> >>> Alternately I will need to figure out how to run the sparc on qemu here...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks very much for all the testing though! :-D
> >>>
> >>> Ira
> >>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Still testing ppc images.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ppc image tests are passing with this patch.
> >>>>
> >>>> Guenter
> >>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
