Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
Hi all,
[...]
> > static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_exynos5 = {
> > .variant = {
> > .nr_windows = 5,
> > - .vidtcon = VIDTCON0,
> > + .vidtcon = FIMD_V8_VIDTCON0,
>
> Yes, this method looks good imo. Maybe even having something like
> vidtcon_base in
> variant structure will be enough to cover all VIDTCON0-3 registers.
>
Yes, I agree. And how about changing the name of s3c_fb_drvierdata to
xxx_fimd_v8 not xxx_fimd_exynos5? It's time to use independent from SoC name
because we don't have any guarantee of same address on all of EXYNOS5 SoCs.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
