Hello Laurent, 17.04.2020 22:30, Laurent Pinchart пишет: ... >> #include <drm/drm_atomic.h> >> +#include <drm/drm_bridge.h> > > You could add a forward declaration of struct drm_bridge instead, that > can lower the compilation time a little bit. This include is not only for the struct, but also for the drm_bridge_attach(). It looks to me that it should be nicer to keep the include here. ... >> + port = of_get_child_by_name(output->of_node, "port"); > > Do you need to check for the presence of a port node first ? Can you > just check the return value of drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(), and fall > back to "nvidia,panel" if it returns -ENODEV ? Without the check, the drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge() prints a very noisy error message about missing port node for every output that doesn't have a graph specified in a device-tree (HDMI, DSI and etc). https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7-rc1/source/drivers/of/property.c#L621 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
