Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-04-15 08:48:40) > Allow people to specify to use a GPIO for hot-plug-detect. Add an > example. > > NOTE: The current patch adding support for hpd-gpios to the Linux > driver for hpd-gpios only adds enough support to the driver so that > the bridge can use one of its own GPIOs. The bindings, however, are > written generically. > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > .../bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml | 10 +++++++++- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml > index 8cacc6db33a9..554bfd003000 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml > @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ properties: > const: 1 > description: See ../../pwm/pwm.yaml for description of the cell formats. > > + hpd-gpios: > + maxItems: 1 > + description: If present use the given GPIO for hot-plug-detect. Shouldn't this go in the panel node? And the panel driver should get the gpio and poll it after powering up the panel? Presumably that's why we have the no-hpd property in the simple panel binding vs. putting it here in the bridge. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
