On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:45:28PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > On 20.07.2012 13:17, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >Static checkers complain if this we don't check for allocation failure. > >Also we can use the new kmalloc_array() function here as a cleanup. > > > >Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > What's the benefit of using kmalloc_array instead of just kmalloc? > It has built in integer overflow protection. Whenever I see multiplication in kmalloc(), I automatically start to audit for overflows, but now, ha ha, just change it to kmalloc_array() and forget about it. (There weren't any integer overflow problems in the original code, btw). regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
