On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 05:00:23PM -0800, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> When memory is migrated to the GPU, it is likely to be accessed by GPU
> code soon afterwards. Instead of waiting for a GPU fault, map the
> migrated memory into the GPU page tables with the same access permissions
> as the source CPU page table entries. This preserves copy on write
> semantics.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Originally this patch was targeted for Jason's rdma tree since other HMM
> related changes were queued there. Now that those have been merged, this
> patch just contains changes to nouveau so it could go through any tree.
> I guess Ben Skeggs' tree would be appropriate.
Yep
> +static inline struct nouveau_pfnmap_args *
> +nouveau_pfns_to_args(void *pfns)
don't use static inline inside C files
> +{
> + struct nvif_vmm_pfnmap_v0 *p =
> + container_of(pfns, struct nvif_vmm_pfnmap_v0, phys);
> +
> + return container_of(p, struct nouveau_pfnmap_args, p);
And this should just be
return container_of(pfns, struct nouveau_pfnmap_args, p.phys);
> +static struct nouveau_svmm *
> +nouveau_find_svmm(struct nouveau_svm *svm, struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> + struct nouveau_ivmm *ivmm;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(ivmm, &svm->inst, head) {
> + if (ivmm->svmm->notifier.mm == mm)
> + return ivmm->svmm;
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
Is this re-implementing mmu_notifier_get() ?
Jason
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
