Re: [PATCH] drm: rework SET_MASTER and DROP_MASTER perm handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 13:27, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This commit reworks the permission handling of the two ioctls. In
> particular it enforced the CAP_SYS_ADMIN check only, if:
>  - we're issuing the ioctl from process other than the one which opened
> the node, and
>  - we are, or were master in the past
>
> This ensures that we:
>  - do not regress the systemd-logind style of DRM_MASTER arbitrator
>  - allow applications which do not use systemd-logind to drop their
> master capabilities (and regain them at later point) ... w/o running as
> root.
>
> See the comment above drm_master_check_perm() for more details.
>
> v1:
>  - Tweak wording, fixup all checks, add igt test
>
> Cc: Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Testcase: igt/core_setmaster/master-drop-set-user
> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c  | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c |  4 +--
>  include/drm/drm_file.h      | 11 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
> index cc9acd986c68..b26986bca271 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
> @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static int drm_set_master(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *fpriv,
>                 }
>         }
>
> +       fpriv->was_master = (ret == 0);
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> @@ -179,12 +180,67 @@ static int drm_new_set_master(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *fpriv)
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * In the olden days the SET/DROP_MASTER ioctls used to return EACCES when
> + * CAP_SYS_ADMIN was not set. This was used to prevent rogue applications
> + * from becoming master and/or failing to release it.
> + *
> + * At the same time, the first client (for a given VT) is _always_ master.
> + * Thus in order for the ioctls to succeed, one had to _explicitly_ run the
> + * application as root or flip the setuid bit.
> + *
> + * If the CAP_SYS_ADMIN was missing, no other client could become master...
> + * EVER :-( Leading to a) the graphics session dying badly or b) a completely
> + * locked session.
> + *
> + *
> + * As some point systemd-logind was introduced to orchestrate and delegate
> + * master as applicable. It does so by opening the fd and passing it to users
> + * while in itself logind a) does the set/drop master per users' request and
> + * b)  * implicitly drops master on VT switch.
> + *
> + * Even though logind looks like the future, there are a few issues:
> + *  - using it is not possible on some platforms
> + *  - applications may not be updated to use it,
> + *  - any client which fails to drop master* can DoS the application using
> + * logind, to a varying degree.
> + *
> + * * Either due missing CAP_SYS_ADMIN or simply not calling DROP_MASTER.
> + *
> + *
> + * Here we implement the next best thing:
> + *  - ensure the logind style of fd passing works unchanged, and
> + *  - allow a client to drop/set master, iff it is/was master at a given point
> + * in time.
> + *
> + * As a result this fixes, the following when using root-less build w/o logind
> + * - startx - some drivers work fine regardless
> + * - weston
> + * - various compositors based on wlroots
> + */
> +static int
> +drm_master_check_perm(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv)
> +{
> +       if (file_priv->pid == task_pid(current) && file_priv->was_master)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> +               return -EACCES;
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int drm_setmaster_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>                         struct drm_file *file_priv)
>  {
>         int ret = 0;
>
>         mutex_lock(&dev->master_mutex);
> +
> +       ret = drm_master_check_perm(dev, file_priv);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto out_unlock;
> +
>         if (drm_is_current_master(file_priv))
>                 goto out_unlock;
>
> @@ -229,6 +285,12 @@ int drm_dropmaster_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>         int ret = -EINVAL;
>
>         mutex_lock(&dev->master_mutex);
> +
> +       ret = drm_master_check_perm(dev, file_priv);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto out_unlock;
> +
> +       ret = -EINVAL;
>         if (!drm_is_current_master(file_priv))
>                 goto out_unlock;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> index 9e41972c4bbc..73e31dd4e442 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> @@ -599,8 +599,8 @@ static const struct drm_ioctl_desc drm_ioctls[] = {
>         DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SET_SAREA_CTX, drm_legacy_setsareactx, DRM_AUTH|DRM_MASTER|DRM_ROOT_ONLY),
>         DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_GET_SAREA_CTX, drm_legacy_getsareactx, DRM_AUTH),
>
> -       DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SET_MASTER, drm_setmaster_ioctl, DRM_ROOT_ONLY),
> -       DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_DROP_MASTER, drm_dropmaster_ioctl, DRM_ROOT_ONLY),
> +       DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SET_MASTER, drm_setmaster_ioctl, 0),
> +       DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_DROP_MASTER, drm_dropmaster_ioctl, 0),
>
>         DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_ADD_CTX, drm_legacy_addctx, DRM_AUTH|DRM_ROOT_ONLY),
>         DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_RM_CTX, drm_legacy_rmctx, DRM_AUTH|DRM_MASTER|DRM_ROOT_ONLY),
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h
> index 19df8028a6c4..c4746c9d3619 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_file.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h
> @@ -201,6 +201,17 @@ struct drm_file {
>          */
>         bool writeback_connectors;
>
> +       /**
> +        * @was_master:
> +        *
> +        * This client has or had, master capability. Protected by struct
> +        * &drm_device.master_mutex.
> +        *
> +        * This is used to ensure that CAP_SYS_ADMIN is not enforced, if the
> +        * client is or was master in the past.
> +        */
> +       bool was_master;
> +
>         /**
>          * @is_master:
>          *
> --
> 2.25.0
>

Humble poke?

-Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux