Re: [PATCH, RFC] i.MX DRM support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:05:06PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 03:43:22PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > The following is the state-of-the-art i.MX IPU (Image Processing Unit)
> > DRM support.
> > 
> > This code is around for quite some time now and has been posted several
> > times with different APIs, first with plain old framebuffer support, now
> > DRM, first platform device binding, now devicetree. Unfortunately there's
> > quite much code needed to get something useful out of the IPU, so these
> > patches haven't received a lot of attention from people not involved in
> > i.MX. I think we have now come to a point where this code needs more public
> > exposure and where it's easier to talk in incremental changes instead of
> > blobs. Therefore I request this to go to staging for some cycles.
> 
> Dave, Greg,
> 
> Comments to this one? I addressed the comments I received so far and am
> about to respin this series. Is it ok to put this to staging? If yes,
> should I move the whole stuff into drivers/staging/ or should it stay
> in drivers/gpu/drm with just a Kconfig dependency on STAGING?

That's up to the DRM subsystem maintainer to choose.

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux