Hi Stephen
On 2020-01-27 10:46, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Abhinav Kumar (2020-01-23 14:40:45)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index 99769d6..148bfa4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -4199,6 +4200,57 @@ static void
fixup_detailed_cea_mode_clock(struct drm_display_mode *mode)
mode->clock = clock;
}
+static bool cea_db_is_hdmi_colorimetry_data_block(const u8 *db)
+{
+ if (cea_db_tag(db) != USE_EXTENDED_TAG)
+ return false;
+
+ if (db[1] != COLORIMETRY_DATA_BLOCK)
+ return false;
+
+ if (cea_db_payload_len(db) < 2)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void
+drm_parse_colorimetry_data_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
const u8 *db)
+{
+ struct drm_hdmi_info *info = &connector->display_info.hdmi;
+
+ /* As per CEA 861-G spec */
+ /* Byte 3 Bit 0: xvYCC_601 */
+ if (db[2] & BIT(0))
Why not use the defines added in drm_edid.h in this patch? Then the
comments can be removed because the code would look like
if (db[2] & DRM_EDID_CLRMETRY_xvYCC_601)
[Abhinav] Sure, will make the change and upload a v2
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel