Re: [PATCH] drm/edid: Do dmt_modes_for_range less aggressively

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 14:55 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Only fill it in for pre-1.1 monitors - when GTF hadn't yet been defined
> - or for EDID 1.4's explicit "just a range, not a timing formula" case.
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/51146
> Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx>

Self-nak, at any rate hold off from doing this for the moment.  The bz
above is turning out more subtle than I was expecting.

I'm really not a fan of how the extra_modes changes introduced new
failure cases despite my best efforts to be conservative.  Wish I'd said
no harder.

- ajax

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux