On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Il Han <corone.il.han@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi All,An uninitialized return value is returned.
If the value is not necessary,
it would be better to return the constant 0.
Signed-off-by: Il Han <corone.il.han@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c
index abe89db..d4091eb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c
@@ -121,7 +121,6 @@ nv04_fence_create(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct nv04_fence_priv *priv;
- int ret;
priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!priv)
@@ -136,5 +135,5 @@ nv04_fence_create(struct drm_device *dev)
priv->base.sync = nv04_fence_sync;
priv->base.read = nv04_fence_read;
dev_priv->eng[NVOBJ_ENGINE_FENCE] = &priv->base.engine;
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
--
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Why not modify "int ret;" to "int ret = 0;"? Below is the benefit:
1. return the constant 0 as wish.
2. The variable ret can be used if we want.
Best Regards,
Bing
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel