On 10/31/19 11:35 AM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 03:49:13PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
...
>> +
>> +static void __remove_refs_from_head(struct page *page, int refs)
>> +{
>> + /* Do a get_page() first, in case refs == page->_refcount */
>> + get_page(page);
>> + page_ref_sub(page, refs);
>> + put_page(page);
>> +}
>
> I wonder if this is better implemented as "put_compound_head()"? To match the
> try_get_compound_head() call below?
Hi Ira,
Good idea, I'll rename it to that.
>
>> +
>> +static int __huge_pt_done(struct page *head, int nr_recorded_pages, int *nr)
>> +{
>> + *nr += nr_recorded_pages;
>> + SetPageReferenced(head);
>> + return 1;
>
> When will this return anything but 1?
>
Never, but it saves a line at all four call sites, by having it return like that.
I could see how maybe people would prefer to just have it be a void function,
and return 1 directly at the call sites. Since this was a lower line count I
thought maybe it would be slightly better, but it's hard to say really.
thanks,
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
