On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:28:04 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > We should only frob adjusted_mode. This is in preparation of > a massive patch by Laurent Pinchart to make the mode argument > const. > > The only thing we actually touch is mode->clock, but only if > it's a panel. And in that case we also set adjusted_mode->clock > to the same value. All the generic code already uses the > adjusted_mode exclusively, so we only have to move the dp > link bw calculations over to that. This requires a small > changes so that the shared code with mode_valid doesn't > touch the mode argument. Separate patch please, I'm sure you are right, but that is the scary one... > > Also mark the mode argument of pch_panel_fitting const. > > Reported-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 19 +++++++------------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > index 296cfc2..05c4748 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ intel_dp_max_data_rate(int max_link_clock, int max_lanes) > static bool > intel_dp_adjust_dithering(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > struct drm_display_mode *mode, > - struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode) > + bool adjust_mode) Would this look more pleasant if you rewrote this function so that the adjustment of flags was done in the caller? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
