On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 07:49:08PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > The MIPI DSI controller in Allwinner A64 is similar to A33. > > But unlike A33, A64 doesn't have DSI_SCLK gating so it is valid > to with separate compatible for A64 on the same driver. > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml > index dafc0980c4fa..cfcc84d38084 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml > @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ properties: > "#size-cells": true > > compatible: > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi > + enum: > + - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi > + - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dsi How did you test this? It will report an error when running the validation Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel