On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 02:22:24AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 09:48:11AM +0000, Brian Starkey wrote: > > Hi James, > > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 02:13:27AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote: > > > > > > Hi Brian: > > > > > > Since one monitor can support mutiple color-formats, this DT property > > > supply a way for user to select a specific one from this supported > > > color-formats. > > > > Modifying DT is a _really_ user-unfriendly way of specifying > > preferences. If we want a user to be able to pick a preferred format, > > then it should probably be via the atomic API as Ville mentioned. > > > > Hi Brian: > > Agree, a drm UPAI might be the best & right way for this. > > I can raise a new thread/topic to discuss the "HOW TO", maybe after the > Chinese national day. > > LAST: > what do you think about this patch: > - Just drop it, waiting for the new uapi > - or keep it, and replace it once new uapi is ready. The bit-depth stuff is clear and non-controversial, so you could split that out and merge it. For the YUV stuff, I think it would be fine to merge the implementation that we discussed here - force YUV for modes which must be YUV, and leave the user-preference stuff for a later UAPI. Thanks, -Brian > > Thanks > James > > > Cheers, > > -Brian _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
