Am 19.09.19 um 16:28 schrieb Sven Van Asbroeck:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 4:05 AM Koenig, Christian
> <Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> +out4:
>>> + kfree(i2s_pdata);
>>> +out3:
>>> + kfree(adev->acp.acp_res);
>>> +out2:
>>> + kfree(adev->acp.acp_cell);
>>> +out1:
>>> + kfree(adev->acp.acp_genpd);
>> kfree on a NULL pointer is harmless, so a single error label should be
>> sufficient.
> That is true, but I notice that the adev structure comes from outside this
> driver:
adev is a very integral part of the driver and always zero initialized:
adev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct amdgpu_device), GFP_KERNEL);
Regards,
Christian.
>
> static int acp_hw_init(void *handle)
> {
> ...
> struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
> ...
> }
>
> As far as I can tell, the init() does not explicitly set these to NULL:
> adev->acp.acp_res
> adev->acp.acp_cell
> adev->acp.acp_genpd
>
> I am assuming that core code sets these to NULL, before calling
> acp_hw_init(). But is that guaranteed or simply a happy accident?
> Ie. if they are NULL today, are they likely to remain NULL tomorrow?
>
> Because calling kfree() on a stale pointer would be, well
> not good. Especially not on an error path, which typically
> does not receive much testing, if any.
>
> My apologies if I have misinterpreted this, I am not familiar with
> this code base.
>
> Sven
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
