## TL;DR This revision addresses comments from Stephen and Bjorn Helgaas. Most changes are pretty minor stuff that doesn't affect the API in anyway. One significant change, however, is that I added support for freeing kunit_resource managed resources before the test case is finished via kunit_resource_destroy(). Additionally, Bjorn pointed out that I broke KUnit on certain configurations (like the default one for x86, whoops). Based on Stephen's feedback on the previous change, I think we are pretty close. I am not expecting any significant changes from here on out. ## Background This patch set proposes KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. Unlike Autotest and kselftest, KUnit is a true unit testing framework; it does not require installing the kernel on a test machine or in a VM (however, KUnit still allows you to run tests on test machines or in VMs if you want[1]) and does not require tests to be written in userspace running on a host kernel. Additionally, KUnit is fast: From invocation to completion KUnit can run several dozen tests in about a second. Currently, the entire KUnit test suite for KUnit runs in under a second from the initial invocation (build time excluded). KUnit is heavily inspired by JUnit, Python's unittest.mock, and Googletest/Googlemock for C++. KUnit provides facilities for defining unit test cases, grouping related test cases into test suites, providing common infrastructure for running tests, mocking, spying, and much more. ### What's so special about unit testing? A unit test is supposed to test a single unit of code in isolation, hence the name. There should be no dependencies outside the control of the test; this means no external dependencies, which makes tests orders of magnitudes faster. Likewise, since there are no external dependencies, there are no hoops to jump through to run the tests. Additionally, this makes unit tests deterministic: a failing unit test always indicates a problem. Finally, because unit tests necessarily have finer granularity, they are able to test all code paths easily solving the classic problem of difficulty in exercising error handling code. ### Is KUnit trying to replace other testing frameworks for the kernel? No. Most existing tests for the Linux kernel are end-to-end tests, which have their place. A well tested system has lots of unit tests, a reasonable number of integration tests, and some end-to-end tests. KUnit is just trying to address the unit test space which is currently not being addressed. ### More information on KUnit There is a bunch of documentation near the end of this patch set that describes how to use KUnit and best practices for writing unit tests. For convenience I am hosting the compiled docs here[2]. Additionally for convenience, I have applied these patches to a branch[3]. The repo may be cloned with: git clone https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux This patchset is on the kunit/rfc/v5.3/v13 branch. ## Changes Since Last Version - Added support for freeing kunit_resources (KUnit managed resources) via kunit_resource_destroy() as suggested by Stephen. - Promoted WARN() after __noreturn function to BUG() in "[PATCH v13 09/18] kunit: test: add support for test abort" as suggested by Stephen. - Dropped concept of death test since I am not actually using it yet as pointed out by Stephen. - Replaced usage of warn_slowpath_fmt with WARN in kunit_do_assertion since warn_slowpath_fmt is not available on some build configurations, as pointed out by Bjorn. - Lots of other minor changes suggested by Stephen. [1] https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/usage.html#kunit-on-non-uml-architectures [2] https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/ [3] https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux/+/kunit/rfc/v5.3/v13 -- 2.23.0.rc1.153.gdeed80330f-goog _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
