Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian König<deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
Hi Dave,

there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA code,
so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit.

Most of the stuff still works fine without those offending changes, so to avoid
mailing around unrelated and already reviewed patches, I request the include
the following 17 patches into drm-next.

If you prefer to merge they are also available from
git://people.freedesktop.org/~deathsimple/linux branch reset-rework.

Cheers,
Christian.

I am ok with this 17 patchset, i just sent 3 patch on top of those 17 that
bring back some other of the previous cleanup.
At least for now those three are NAK, cause I just realized we need to put those on top of a more sophisticated fence implementation.

Your idea of not using a list, but 64 bit sequences instead actually sounds quite nifty to me. Going to hack something together in the next couple of hours.

Christian.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux