On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, <j.glisse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ok so i reread stuff and the : > drm/radeon: add general purpose fence signaled callback > is a big NAK actually. It change the paradigm. Moving most of > the handling into the irq process which is something i am intimatly > convinced we should avoid. > > Here is the patchset up to ib pool cleanup. I have yet rebase the > other patches as i am tracking done some issue in the sa allocation. > > Cheers, > Jerome > Before i forget, the big issue with doing work from irq handler is that we never know in middle of what other part can be. I believe it's lot better to have irq process only update fence (signaled/not signaled). and have the actual work happening on behalf of the process wether through sa alloc path or ttm path. Cheers, Jerome _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
