From: Christian König <deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx>
We should signal the caller that we haven't waited at all.
v2: only change fence_wait_next not fence_wait_last.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
index 1a9765a..2fbbc34 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ int radeon_fence_wait_next(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
}
if (list_empty(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].emitted)) {
write_unlock_irqrestore(&rdev->fence_lock, irq_flags);
- return 0;
+ return -ENOENT;
}
fence = list_entry(rdev->fence_drv[ring].emitted.next,
struct radeon_fence, list);
--
1.7.7.6
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
