On 30.04.2012 17:12, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jerome Glisse<j.glisse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Christian König
<deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Dave,
if nobody has a last moment concern please include the following patches in drm-next.
Except for some minor fixes they have already been on the list for quite some time,
but I intentional left out the debugfs related patches cause we haven't finished the
discussion about them yet.
If you prefer to merge them directly, I also made them available as reset-rework
branch here: git://people.freedesktop.org/~deathsimple/linux
Cheers,
Christian.
I am not completely ok, i am against patch 5. I need sometime to review it.
Cheers,
Jerome
Sorr mean patch 7
I just started to wonder :) what's wrong with patch 7?
Please keep in mind that implementing proper locking in the lower level
objects allows us to remove quite some locking in the upper layers.
By the way, do you mind when I dig into the whole locking stuff of the
kernel driver a bit more? There seems to be allot of possibilities to
cleanup and simplify the overall driver.
Cheers,
Christian.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
