Re: [PATCH] drm/edid: Try harder to fix up base EDID blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/16/12 10:40 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
Requiring the first byte of the EDID base block header to be 0 means we
don't fix up as many transfer errors as we could.  Instead have the
callers specify whether it's meant to be block 0 or not, and
conditionally run header fixup based on that.

Anybody?  This appears to be a pretty common form of EDID corruption.

- ajax

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux