Le 23/04/2012 00:18, Marcin Slusarz a écrit :
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz<marcin.slusarz@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c
index 6899547..a61853f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c
@@ -435,6 +435,11 @@ nv84_graph_tlb_flush(struct drm_device *dev, int engine)
if ((tmp& 7) == 1)
idle = false;
}
+
+ if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+ ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
+ break;
+ }
} while (!idle&& !(timeout = ptimer->read(dev) - start> 2000000000));
if (timeout) {
Good, but who should send the kill signal in the first place?
Shouldn't nouveau drm terminate the process(es) associated with the
channel that generated the lockup ?
Can you provide more info on how the lockup recovery works?
Thanks in advance,
Martin
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
