On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 05:09:16PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 5:03 PM Kuehling, Felix <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 2019-07-03 10:10 a.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:55:08AM +0000, Kuehling, Felix wrote: > > >> From: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@xxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> In order to pass mirror instead of mm to hmm_range_register, we need > > >> pass bo instead of ttm to amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages because mirror > > >> is part of amdgpu_mn structure, which is accessible from bo. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@xxxxxxx> > > >> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx> > > >> Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx> > > >> CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> CC: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> CC: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx> > > >> CC: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> > > >> drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 1 - > > >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 5 ++--- > > >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 2 +- > > >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 3 +-- > > >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mn.c | 8 ++++++++ > > >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mn.h | 5 +++++ > > >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > > >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 5 +++-- > > >> 8 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > This is too big to use as a conflict resolution, what you could do is > > > apply the majority of the patch on top of your tree as-is (ie keep > > > using the old hmm_range_register), then the conflict resolution for > > > the updated AMD GPU tree can be a simple one line change: > > > > > > - hmm_range_register(range, mm, start, > > > + hmm_range_register(range, mirror, start, > > > start + ttm->num_pages * PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHIFT); > > > > > > Which is trivial for everone to deal with, and solves the problem. > > > > Good idea. > > > > > > > > > > This is probably a much better option than rebasing the AMD gpu tree. > > > > I think Alex is planning to merge hmm.git into an updated drm-next and > > then rebase amd-staging-drm-next on top of that. Rebasing our > > amd-staging-drm-next is something we do every month or two anyway. > > > > Go ahead and respin your patch as per the suggestion above. then I > can apply it I can either merge hmm into amd's drm-next or we can just > provide the conflict fix patch whichever is easier. Which hmm branch > is for 5.3? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/?h=hmm Yes, anything for 5.2 should go to Andrew. Jason _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
