Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm: introduce DRIVER_FORCE_AUTH

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 03.07.2019 16:00 schrieb Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 14:48, Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Well this is still a NAK.
>
> As stated previously please just don't remove DRM_AUTH and keep the functionality as it is.
>
AFAICT nobody was in favour of your suggestion to remove DRM_AUTH from
the handle to/from fd ioclts.
Thus this seems like the second best option.

Well just keep it. As I said please don't change anything here.

Dropping DRM_AUTH from the driver IOCTLs was sufficient to work around the problems at hand far as I know.

And stopping those two at least prevents userspace to abuse this even more.

On the other hand I haven't seen any NAK on dropping DRM_AUTH from them.

Christian.



Third route that I see is doing driver_name == "amdgpu" || driver_name
== "radeon" in core.
If you have alternative solution I'm all ears.

-Emil

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux