Re: [PATCH v5 13/18] kunit: tool: add Python wrappers for running KUnit tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:02:55AM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 5:01 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 01:26:08AM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-all_passed.log
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-crash.log
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure.log
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_output_isolated_correctly.log
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_read_from_file.kconfig
> >
> > Why are these being added upstream? The commit log does not explain
> > this.
> 
> Oh sorry, those are for testing purposes. I thought that was clear
> from being in the test_data directory. I will reference it in the
> commit log in the next revision.

Still, I don't get it. They seem to be results from a prior run. Why do
we need them for testing purposes?

  Luis
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux