Hi Emil. > > > > Thanks, > > patch applied to drm-misc-next and will be pushed out soon. > > > Isn't an ack/rb from a DT maintainer a requirement before being picked > via the DRM trees? > It used to be a thing, although it could have changed recently. I got OK via irc to take some simple panel bindings patches. Which explains the lack of a-b or r-b on this patch from any DT folks. So I processed what was in queue. Maybe the OK was only for a smaller set of patches but I did process only panel-bindings that I was ready to add my r-b on. > > AFAICT there are no users for this binding, yet I'm not sure if that > is a requirement. To my best knowledge a kernel user is not a requirement. In this case there is a patch in-the-works and I considered to wait until the patch was ready. But decided to process the DT-binding as the binding is a prerequisite for the panel driver, but not the other way around. Again to my understanding. So everything was done to avoid having panel patches hanging in dri-devel for excessive amount of time. One could say that this was already the case that they had waited for too long. Another - not so obvious thing . was that having all patches in drm-misc-next allows us to have an easier time migrating all panel patches to yaml which I hope will take place in the next month or two. I am waiting for the inital patch-set by Rob to land, and then there is some janitorial job to migrate remainign panel bindings to yaml. This is easier to do with everyting in drm-misc-next rather than asking several different persons to do it. Once done there will be lot of examples to work from, so for new panel bindings it should be easier. Sam _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
