On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:42:05PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > That way we can ditch our gem_prime_res_obj implementation. Since ttm > absolutely needs the right reservation object all the boilerplate is > already there and we just have to wire it up correctly. > > Note that gem/prime doesn't care when we do this, as long as we do it > before the bo is registered and someone can call the handle2fd ioctl > on it. > > Aside: ttm_buffer_object.ttm_resv could probably be ditched in favour > of always passing a non-NULL resv to ttm_bo_init(). At least for gem > drivers that would avoid having two of these, on in ttm_buffer_object > and the other in drm_gem_object, one just there for confusion. Something for todo.rst - so this does not get lost in a changelog people will soon forget? Sam _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
