| Bug ID | 110961 |
|---|---|
| Summary | Are provoded libdrm packages completely open source? |
| Product | DRI |
| Version | unspecified |
| Hardware | Other |
| OS | All |
| Status | NEW |
| Severity | major |
| Priority | medium |
| Component | DRM/AMDgpu-pro |
| Assignee | dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org |
| Reporter | ashark@linuxcomp.ru |
19.20-812932 release for Ubuntu Provided libdrm related packages have MIT licence. But are they built completely from open source? In the changelog I can see that it is some amd-mainline-hybrid-master20190125. And actually if I omit these packages while using proprietay OpenGL, applications crashes; and clinfo utility crashes with segfault. I tested it in Ubuntu 18.04.2, in Ubuntu 19.04 and in Arch Linux. In Ubuntu 19.04 the repo's libraries have the same version as provided in bundled archive. But it was still failing with them (I even tried to place repo's libraries to /opt location, it did not help). I want to avoid needing of installation of these libdrm packages (libdrm-amdgpu-amdgpu1, libdrm-amdgpu-common, libdrm2-amdgpu) because I am repacking amdgpu-pro for arch linux. Is that possible? If not, then why do not name these packages and their libraries with -pro prefix? Ideally, I want it to use libdrm provided by arch linux. In that case I could even repack all other files to the normal system paths instead of placing all to /opt. List of packages that I still use for Arch are: libdrm-amdgpu-amdgpu1: provides libdrm_amdgpu.so.1.0.0 libdrm-amdgpu-common: provides amdgpu.ids file that slightly differs from Arch's standard one libdrm2-amdgpu: provides 91-amdgpu-pro-modeset.rules libdrm.so.2.4.0 libkms.so.1.0.0
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
