On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 05:37:58PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:20 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:59:08PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:51:09AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > The function can not fail, and no one checks the current return value, > > > > so just mark it as a void function so no one gets confused. > > > > > > > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c | 5 ++--- > > > > include/drm/drm_debugfs.h | 9 ++++----- > > > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c > > > > index 6f2802e9bfb5..515569002c86 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c > > > > @@ -270,8 +270,8 @@ int drm_debugfs_init(struct drm_minor *minor, int minor_id, > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > -int drm_debugfs_remove_files(const struct drm_info_list *files, int count, > > > > - struct drm_minor *minor) > > > > +void drm_debugfs_remove_files(const struct drm_info_list *files, int count, > > > > + struct drm_minor *minor) > > > > > > We're trying to entirely nuke this function here, see the kerneldoc for > > > drm_debugfs_create_files(). Only user left is tegra, and we call the > > > "remove all debugfs files" and the ->early_unregister hooks all from the > > > same place. So this can all be garbage collected. It's mildly annoying > > > because we'd need to move the kfree from ->early_unregister into ->destroy > > > callbacks, because connectors are unregister before we throw away all the > > > debugfs files in drm_dev_unregister(). But imo that's cleaner anway. > > > > I would love to see this function gone, it can also make things a lot > > simpler from the point of view of creating the debugfs files as well, as > > no dentries will need to be saved. > > > > > Up for that? > > > > Sure, I can do that. I have a much larger patch messing with > > drm_debugfs_create_files() that I want you all to be in a good mood for > > when I submit it (it touches all drivers at once), so I might as well > > clean this up first :) > > Oh don't worry, we've had a pile of cleanup todo tasks in this area > since a long time. You doing them all is going to make me a happy > camper :-) > > Only thing to be aware of is that we have a bit a habit of dragging > good contributors of refactoring/cleanup/fundamental work like this > into the drm fold for good. You might get stuck ... Hah... Anyway, what tree/branch should I do this work on? I see drm-next, is that the one to use, but it doesn't seem to have the other patches you all said you accepted from me for this debugfs cleanup already. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
