On 6/13/19 5:43 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:58:29PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:53:02PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
>>>
...
>> Hum, so the only thing this config does is short circuit here:
>>
>> static inline bool is_device_public_page(const struct page *page)
>> {
>> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_PAGEMAP_OPS) &&
>> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEVICE_PUBLIC) &&
>> is_zone_device_page(page) &&
>> page->pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC;
>> }
>>
>> Which is called all over the place..
>
> <sigh> yes but the earlier patch:
>
> [PATCH 03/22] mm: remove hmm_devmem_add_resource
>
> Removes the only place type is set to MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC.
>
> So I think it is ok. Frankly I was wondering if we should remove the public
> type altogether but conceptually it seems ok. But I don't see any users of it
> so... should we get rid of it in the code rather than turning the config off?
>
> Ira
That seems reasonable. I recall that the hope was for those IBM Power 9
systems to use _PUBLIC, as they have hardware-based coherent device (GPU)
memory, and so the memory really is visible to the CPU. And the IBM team
was thinking of taking advantage of it. But I haven't seen anything on
that front for a while.
So maybe it will get re-added as part of a future patchset to use that
kind of memory, but yes, we should not hesitate to clean house at this
point, and delete unused code.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
>
>>
>> So, yes, we really don't want any distro or something to turn this on
>> until it has a use.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Jason
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-nvdimm mailing list
>> Linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
