On 6/7/19 9:05 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
If the trylock on the hmm->mirrors_sem fails the function will return
without decrementing the notifiers that were previously incremented. Since
the caller will not call invalidate_range_end() on EAGAIN this will result
in notifiers becoming permanently incremented and deadlock.
If the sync_cpu_device_pagetables() required blocking the function will
not return EAGAIN even though the device continues to touch the
pages. This is a violation of the mmu notifier contract.
Switch, and rename, the ranges_lock to a spin lock so we can reliably
obtain it without blocking during error unwind.
The error unwind is necessary since the notifiers count must be held
incremented across the call to sync_cpu_device_pagetables() as we cannot
allow the range to become marked valid by a parallel
invalidate_start/end() pair while doing sync_cpu_device_pagetables().
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/hmm.h | 2 +-
mm/hmm.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
I almost lost this patch - it is part of the series, hasn't been
posted before, and wasn't sent with the rest, sorry.
diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index bf013e96525771..0fa8ea34ccef6d 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
struct hmm {
struct mm_struct *mm;
struct kref kref;
- struct mutex lock;
+ spinlock_t ranges_lock;
struct list_head ranges;
struct list_head mirrors;
struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index 4215edf737ef5b..10103a24e9b7b3 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static struct hmm *hmm_get_or_create(struct mm_struct *mm)
init_rwsem(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
hmm->mmu_notifier.ops = NULL;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hmm->ranges);
- mutex_init(&hmm->lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&hmm->ranges_lock);
kref_init(&hmm->kref);
hmm->notifiers = 0;
hmm->mm = mm;
@@ -114,18 +114,19 @@ static void hmm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
struct hmm *hmm = container_of(mn, struct hmm, mmu_notifier);
struct hmm_mirror *mirror;
+ unsigned long flags;
/* Bail out if hmm is in the process of being freed */
if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&hmm->kref))
return;
- mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
/*
* Since hmm_range_register() holds the mmget() lock hmm_release() is
* prevented as long as a range exists.
*/
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&hmm->ranges));
- mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
down_read(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
list_for_each_entry(mirror, &hmm->mirrors, list) {
@@ -141,6 +142,23 @@ static void hmm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
hmm_put(hmm);
}
+static void notifiers_decrement(struct hmm *hmm)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&hmm->ranges_lock);
+
+ hmm->notifiers--;
+ if (!hmm->notifiers) {
+ struct hmm_range *range;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(range, &hmm->ranges, list) {
+ if (range->valid)
+ continue;
+ range->valid = true;
+ }
This just effectively sets all ranges to valid.
I'm not sure that is best.
Shouldn't hmm_range_register() start with range.valid = true and
then hmm_invalidate_range_start() set affected ranges to false?
Then this becomes just wake_up_all() if --notifiers == 0 and
hmm_range_wait_until_valid() should wait for notifiers == 0.
Otherwise, range.valid doesn't really mean it's valid.
+ wake_up_all(&hmm->wq);
+ }
+}
+
static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
const struct mmu_notifier_range *nrange)
{
@@ -148,6 +166,7 @@ static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
struct hmm_mirror *mirror;
struct hmm_update update;
struct hmm_range *range;
+ unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&hmm->kref))
@@ -158,12 +177,7 @@ static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
update.event = HMM_UPDATE_INVALIDATE;
update.blockable = mmu_notifier_range_blockable(nrange);
- if (mmu_notifier_range_blockable(nrange))
- mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
- else if (!mutex_trylock(&hmm->lock)) {
- ret = -EAGAIN;
- goto out;
- }
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
hmm->notifiers++;
list_for_each_entry(range, &hmm->ranges, list) {
if (update.end < range->start || update.start >= range->end)
@@ -171,7 +185,7 @@ static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
range->valid = false;
}
- mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
if (mmu_notifier_range_blockable(nrange))
down_read(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
@@ -179,16 +193,26 @@ static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto out;
}
+
list_for_each_entry(mirror, &hmm->mirrors, list) {
- int ret;
+ int rc;
- ret = mirror->ops->sync_cpu_device_pagetables(mirror, &update);
- if (!update.blockable && ret == -EAGAIN)
+ rc = mirror->ops->sync_cpu_device_pagetables(mirror, &update);
+ if (rc) {
+ if (WARN_ON(update.blockable || rc != -EAGAIN))
+ continue;
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
break;
+ }
}
up_read(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
out:
+ if (ret) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
+ notifiers_decrement(hmm);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
+ }
hmm_put(hmm);
return ret;
}
@@ -197,23 +221,14 @@ static void hmm_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
const struct mmu_notifier_range *nrange)
{
struct hmm *hmm = container_of(mn, struct hmm, mmu_notifier);
+ unsigned long flags;
if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&hmm->kref))
return;
- mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
- hmm->notifiers--;
- if (!hmm->notifiers) {
- struct hmm_range *range;
-
- list_for_each_entry(range, &hmm->ranges, list) {
- if (range->valid)
- continue;
- range->valid = true;
- }
- wake_up_all(&hmm->wq);
- }
- mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
+ notifiers_decrement(hmm);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
hmm_put(hmm);
}
@@ -866,6 +881,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
{
unsigned long mask = ((1UL << page_shift) - 1UL);
struct hmm *hmm = mirror->hmm;
+ unsigned long flags;
range->valid = false;
range->hmm = NULL;
@@ -887,7 +903,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
kref_get(&hmm->kref);
/* Initialize range to track CPU page table updates. */
- mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
range->hmm = hmm;
list_add(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
@@ -898,7 +914,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
*/
if (!hmm->notifiers)
range->valid = true;
- mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -914,13 +930,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_range_register);
void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
{
struct hmm *hmm = range->hmm;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (WARN_ON(range->end <= range->start))
return;
- mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
list_del(&range->list);
- mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
/* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */
range->valid = false;
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
