On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 10:31:07AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> The wait_event_timeout macro already tests the condition as its first
> action, so there is no reason to open code another version of this, all
> that does is skip the might_sleep() debugging in common cases, which is
> not helpful.
>
> Further, based on prior patches, we can now simplify the required condition
> test:
> - If range is valid memory then so is range->hmm
> - If hmm_release() has run then range->valid is set to false
> at the same time as dead, so no reason to check both.
> - A valid hmm has a valid hmm->mm.
>
> Allowing the return value of wait_event_timeout() (along with its internal
> barriers) to compute the result of the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3
> - Simplify the wait_event_timeout to not check valid
> ---
> include/linux/hmm.h | 13 ++-----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
> index 1d97b6d62c5bcf..26e7c477490c4e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hmm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
> @@ -209,17 +209,8 @@ static inline unsigned long hmm_range_page_size(const struct hmm_range *range)
> static inline bool hmm_range_wait_until_valid(struct hmm_range *range,
> unsigned long timeout)
> {
> - /* Check if mm is dead ? */
> - if (range->hmm == NULL || range->hmm->dead || range->hmm->mm == NULL) {
> - range->valid = false;
> - return false;
> - }
> - if (range->valid)
> - return true;
> - wait_event_timeout(range->hmm->wq, range->valid || range->hmm->dead,
> - msecs_to_jiffies(timeout));
> - /* Return current valid status just in case we get lucky */
> - return range->valid;
> + return wait_event_timeout(range->hmm->wq, range->valid,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout)) != 0;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.21.0
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
