Hi,
On 06-06-19 15:38, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 01:13:40PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 06-06-19 11:14, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 02:57:59PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
GPD has done it again, make a nice device (good), use way too generic
DMI strings (bad) and use a portrait screen rotated 90 degrees (ugly).
Because of the too generic DMI strings this entry is also doing bios-date
matching, so the gpd_micropc data struct may very well need to be updated
with some extra bios-dates in the future.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
For both patches,
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you, I've pushed both to drm-misc-next now.
Can you add them to drm-misc-fixes please ?
(AFAIK I'm not supposed to do that myself)
You definitely can :)
Now that it's in next though, it's pretty hard to come back in time. I
guess we could just apply it in fixes and let git figure it out, or
revert the one in next. I'm not sure which one is preferred
though.
I thought that the procedure was to get it in -next and then cherry-pick
into -fixes? Git should sort this out without issues when Linus merges
-next; or when we back-merge Linus' tree.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
