On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 08:19:03PM +0000, Harry Wentland wrote: > On 2019-05-30 12:12 p.m., Colin King wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The variable status is initialized with a value that is never read > > and status is reassigned several statements later. This initialization > > is redundant and can be removed. > > > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c > > index 65d6caedbd82..cf6166a1be53 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c > > @@ -2367,7 +2367,7 @@ static bool retrieve_link_cap(struct dc_link *link) > > union down_stream_port_count down_strm_port_count; > > union edp_configuration_cap edp_config_cap; > > union dp_downstream_port_present ds_port = { 0 }; > > - enum dc_status status = DC_ERROR_UNEXPECTED; > > + enum dc_status status; > > Not sure this improves the situation. > > I'd prefer to have a default here in case someone changes the code below > and forgets to set the status. The dead code confuses human readers, because people naturally assume it is not dead. GCC has a feature to warn about uninitialized variables and we're randomly initializing status to a bogus value to disable static analysis... regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel