On 6/6/19 11:47 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: > When building with CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA and CONFIG_CODA_FS enabled as > loadable modules, we see the following warning: > > warning: same module names found: > fs/coda/coda.ko > drivers/media/platform/coda/coda.ko > > Rework so media coda matches the config fragment. Leaving CODA_FS as is > since thats a well known module. > > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile b/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile > index 54e9a73a92ab..588e6bf7c190 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > -coda-objs := coda-common.o coda-bit.o coda-gdi.o coda-h264.o coda-mpeg2.o coda-mpeg4.o coda-jpeg.o > +video-coda-objs := coda-common.o coda-bit.o coda-gdi.o coda-h264.o coda-mpeg2.o coda-mpeg4.o coda-jpeg.o > > -obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += coda.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += video-coda.o How about imx-coda? video-coda suggests it is part of the video subsystem, which it isn't. Regards, Hans > obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX_VDOA) += imx-vdoa.o > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
