On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 5:05 AM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 10:34 PM Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 05:12, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dave, Daniel, > > > > > > More new stuff for 5.3: > > > > > > amdgpu: > > > - Revert timeline support until KHR is ready > > > - Various driver reload fixes > > > - Refactor clock handling in DC > > > - Aux fixes for DC > > > - Bandwidth calculation updates for DC > > > - Fix documentation due to file rename > > > - RAS fix > > > - Fix race in late_init > > > > > > ttm: > > > - Allow for better forward progress when there is heavy memory contention > > > > dim: 137a7da92557 ("Revert "drm/amdgpu: add DRIVER_SYNCOBJ_TIMELINE to > > amdgpu""): mandatory review missing. > > dim: cf25b6444376 ("gpu: amdgpu: fix broken amdgpu_dma_buf.c > > references"): SHA1 in fixes line not found: > > dim: 988076cd8c5c ("drm/amdgpu: rename amdgpu_prime.[ch] into > > amdgpu_dma_buf.[ch]") > > > > The first I'm not worried about, but the fixes line should be fixed > > before I can pull this. > > 2fbd6f94accdbb223acccada68940b50b0c668d9 is the upstream commit in my tree. > > Weird. dim didn't complain when I ran it. I guess the old commit > happened to be in my repo. I'll fix it up. I should check also that it's an ancestor commit, not just that it's in the repo (but that's a few conditions later on, for Dave it obviously failed earlier). Since it's a branch not a tag I can't pull the old version anymore and take a look and figure out what might be the reason, but this should have worked. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel