Re: [RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Ville [iso-8859-1] Syrjälä wrote:

Didn't have time for a detailed look yet, but at least one thing
missing from your patch set is handling of possible_crtcs and
possible_clones for getplane and getencoder ioctls.

Yes I agree and I know. That is still work in progress. The ioctl for constructing the node should do more checks not only for possible_crtcs and possible_clones, but also whether a particular encoder can match the connector and not allow creation of the node with incompatible resources. I have all that on the TODO list, but I wanted to get the patches out early so that I can get some feedback (and hopefully motivate others to contribute).

There will definitely be v3 (and beyond) that will include stuff on my TODO list along with any feedback that I receive.

Also the name "render node" is still very confusing. How about just
callling it a partition or something. Or maybe someone could suggest
a more self explanatory name for this stuff.


Dave has chosen the name two years ago when he did the initial demo work. I am just keeping this name for now (the advantage is that others know of this work by this name, so they know what it is about). However, if there is a concensus for a better name I'll be glad to adopt it.

-- Ilija
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux